LookAhead: the optimal non-decreasing index policy for a time-varying holding cost problem

Keerthana Gurushankar et al.

Queueing Systems2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-025-09967-warticle
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

In practice, the cost of delaying a job can grow as the job waits. Such behavior is modeled by the time-varying holding cost (TVHC) problem, where each job’s instantaneous holding cost increases with its current age (a job’s age is the time since it arrived). The goal of the TVHC problem is to find a scheduling policy that minimizes the time-average total holding cost across all jobs. However, no optimality results are known for the TVHC problem outside of the asymptotic regime. In this paper, we study a simple yet still challenging special case: A two-class M/M/1 queue in which class 1 jobs incur a non-decreasing, time-varying holding cost and class 2 jobs incur a constant holding cost. Our main contribution is deriving the first optimal (non-decreasing) index policy for this special case of the TVHC problem. Our optimal policy, called LookAhead, stems from the following idea: Rather than considering each job’s current holding cost when making scheduling decisions, we should look at their cost some X time into the future, where this X is intuitively called the “lookahead amount." This paper derives that optimal lookahead amount.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-025-09967-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{keerthana2026,
  title        = {{LookAhead: the optimal non-decreasing index policy for a time-varying holding cost problem}},
  author       = {Keerthana Gurushankar et al.},
  journal      = {Queueing Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-025-09967-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

LookAhead: the optimal non-decreasing index policy for a time-varying holding cost problem

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.