A brief review of deep learning methods in mortality forecasting

Huiling Zheng et al.

Annals of Actuarial Science2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100110article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Accurate mortality forecasting is crucial for actuarial pricing, reserving, and capital planning, yet the traditional Lee-Carter model struggles with non-linear age and cohort patterns, coherent multi-population forecasting, and quantifying prediction uncertainties. Recent advances in deep learning provide a range of tools that can address these limitations, but actuarial surveys have not kept pace. This paper provides the first concise view of deep learning in mortality forecasting. We cover six deep network architectures, namely Recurrent Neural Networks, Convolutional Neural Networks, Transformers, Autoencoders, Locally Connected Networks, and Multi-Task Feed-Forward Networks. We discuss how these architectures tackle cohort effects, population coherence, interpretability, and uncertainty in mortality forecasting. Evidence from the literature shows that carefully calibrated deep learning models can consistently outperform the Lee-Carter baselines; however, no single architecture resolves every challenge, and open issues remain with data scarcity, interpretability, uncertainty quantification, and keeping pace with the advances of deep learning. This review is also intended to provide actuaries with a practical roadmap for adopting deep learning models in mortality forecasting.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100110

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{huiling2025,
  title        = {{A brief review of deep learning methods in mortality forecasting}},
  author       = {Huiling Zheng et al.},
  journal      = {Annals of Actuarial Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1748499525100110},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A brief review of deep learning methods in mortality forecasting

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.