A Coach Perspective on a Mastery Motivational Climate in the Competitive Youth Soccer Context

Siv Gjesdal

Sport Psychologist2025https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2023-0110article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This study examined how coaches working in Norwegian competitive youth soccer viewed a mastery motivational climate and how they worked to create such a climate. Seven coaches participated in semistructured interviews (six men and one woman; M age = 27.43, SD = 4.50, average coaching experience = 8 years). A reflexive thematic analysis was used, and results yielded three higher order themes, namely (a) providing opportunities for skill development, (b) interpersonal relationships as a vehicle, and (c) contextual barriers and facilitators. The overall results indicated that while creating a mastery climate seemed to be an ambition for the coaches, they narrowly defined it as balancing the level of mastery and challenge for their players. They found it challenging to maintain a mastery focus when competitive results had real-life consequences for them, and contextual aspects, such as working conditions and the peer climate, could function as either barriers or facilitators.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2023-0110

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{siv2025,
  title        = {{A Coach Perspective on a Mastery Motivational Climate in the Competitive Youth Soccer Context}},
  author       = {Siv Gjesdal},
  journal      = {Sport Psychologist},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2023-0110},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Coach Perspective on a Mastery Motivational Climate in the Competitive Youth Soccer Context

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.