Inclusive Institutions and Sustainable Development:Applying Acemoglu and Robinson’s Framework to theGlobal South
Kainat Yaqoob et al.
What the paper says
Sustainable development in the Global South faces a complex challenge, influenced by environmental, economic, and social factors, as well as issues like poor governance, political instability, and inequality. The literature emphasizes that institutions are crucial in shaping incentives and behaviors that drive development. Inclusive institutions foster sustainability by providing equitable opportunities, safeguarding property rights, and encouraging innovation, whereas extractive institutions—marked by unequal systems and a lack of basic liberties— hinder progress. This research examines how economic and political institutions affect sustainable development in 94 developing countries from 1990 to 2019. Sustainable development, defined as the ecological efficiency of human development, is measured using the Sustainable Development Index (SDI) introduced by Hickel (2020). Economic institutions are measured using two indicators: economic freedom and de jure economic globalization, while political institutions are evaluated via de jure political globalization, judicial independence, democracy, and civil liberties. The empirical analysis shows that all indicators of inclusive institutions positively influence sustainable development in the Global South. Moreover, democracy proved to be the most effective in promoting sustainability, while the effect of de jure political globalization was the weakest in terms of magnitude (though still statistically significant). These findings underscore the vital role of inclusive institutions in achieving sustainability, highlighting their capacity to balance development goals with environmental considerations. This study demonstrates that democracy enhances sustainable development more than economic liberalization in the Global South, challenging conventional policy priorities.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.