arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Carrot or the Stick? An Economic Model of Optimal Course Difficulty, Student Effort and Cheating Using AI

Nodir Adilov & Jeffrey W. Cline

Studies in Microeconomics2025https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222251387434article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Despite the transformative effects large language models are having on education, the current economic models of student cheating do not factor in the impact of a highly capable artificial intelligence (AI). We attempt to fill this gap by constructing an economic model of student effort, course difficulty and cheating using AI on a per-course requirement basis. We find that to maximize student knowledge, there are two viable approaches to instructor selection of course difficulty. The ‘carrot’ approach is characterized by low course difficulty to incentivize effort with a high grade, while the ‘stick’ approach is characterized by high course difficulty to motivate enough effort to pass the course. We also find that student effort falls as the capability of AI increases. As a result, AI can eliminate the strategy of using high course difficulty to motivate students as a viable pedagogical option beyond a certain threshold level of AI capability. JEL Classifications: I21, I23, A22

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222251387434

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nodir2025,
  title        = {{The Carrot or the Stick? An Economic Model of Optimal Course Difficulty, Student Effort and Cheating Using AI}},
  author       = {Nodir Adilov & Jeffrey W. Cline},
  journal      = {Studies in Microeconomics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222251387434},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Carrot or the Stick? An Economic Model of Optimal Course Difficulty, Student Effort and Cheating Using AI

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.