Selling and sales management for successful servitization: a systematic review and research agenda

Christian Kowalkowski et al.

Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management2025https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2025.2502168review
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Servitization—the shift from product to service-centric business models—has attracted widespread attention, yet best practices for selling services and transforming the salesforce remain unclear. In response, this study systematically reviews the literature on selling and sales management for servitization. Analyzing 66 articles across 21 journals, we identify three key themes: customer engagement throughout the purchase journey, skills and abilities of selling actors, and sales management support. Our integrative framework highlights how the selling of services and solutions necessitates a collaborative, cross-functional process of customer engagement across various stages of the journey. Ideally, this engagement fosters recurring cycles with loyalty loops, driven by proactive customer success management. We also present a comprehensive research agenda with four key themes bridging critical gaps in current knowledge. From a managerial perspective, our review underscores that servitization necessitates extensive organizational changes beyond the sales function, affecting not only what firms sell but also how they sell.

6 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2025.2502168

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christian2025,
  title        = {{Selling and sales management for successful servitization: a systematic review and research agenda}},
  author       = {Christian Kowalkowski et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2025.2502168},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Selling and sales management for successful servitization: a systematic review and research agenda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.