arbiter
JournalsAccount

Closing loopholes or maintaining control? Corporate power through algorithmic opacity in Australia’s gig economy regulation

Elvio Anthony Sinopoli

Crime, Law and Social Change2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-026-10268-3article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

No abstract available.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-026-10268-3

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elvio2026,
  title        = {{Closing loopholes or maintaining control? Corporate power through algorithmic opacity in Australia’s gig economy regulation}},
  author       = {Elvio Anthony Sinopoli},
  journal      = {Crime, Law and Social Change},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-026-10268-3},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Closing loopholes or maintaining control? Corporate power through algorithmic opacity in Australia’s gig economy regulation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.