Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China

Huiping Li et al.

Public Finance and Management2025https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251330379article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study investigates redistributive spending in China’s governance system, focusing on fiscal decentralization, interjurisdictional competition, and land finance revenue. Using multilevel modeling of data from 283 prefectural cities and 2,862 county-level jurisdictions, it finds that interjurisdictional competition prioritizes developmental spending over redistributive services. No significant relationship is observed between fiscal capacity—measured by tax revenues or intergovernmental transfers—and redistributive expenditures. However, higher land finance revenues are positively linked to increased redistributive spending. The study attributes this development-oriented strategy to the cadre promotion system, where local officials advance their careers by achieving policy goals through competition for economic investments. By integrating land finance into the analysis of redistributive spending, this research highlights its implications for equity and sustainability. It underscores the urgent need for fiscal and social policy reforms to balance developmental priorities with equitable social welfare provision.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251330379

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{huiping2025,
  title        = {{Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China}},
  author       = {Huiping Li et al.},
  journal      = {Public Finance and Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251330379},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.