arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Reconsidering the enforceability of bare intention to arbitrate: Kvc Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd, [2017] SGHC 32

Nicholas Poon

Singapore Academy of Law Journal2017article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

As arbitration continues to gain popularity as a means of resolving disputes privately, there appears to be an increasing tendency in the courts to recognise, and thereafter, give effect to parties' supposed bare intention to arbitrate, even if the intention can only be tenuously ascertained. It is hoped that the experience in 'KVC Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd' will provoke a reconsideration of the circumstances under which a bare intention to arbitration will be enforced.

Cite this paper

@article{nicholas2017,
  title        = {{Reconsidering the enforceability of bare intention to arbitrate: Kvc Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd, [2017] SGHC 32}},
  author       = {Nicholas Poon},
  journal      = {Singapore Academy of Law Journal},
  year         = {2017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reconsidering the enforceability of bare intention to arbitrate: Kvc Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd, [2017] SGHC 32

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.