Heterogeneous trajectories in digital financial usage intensity: evidence from the Netherlands

Kingstone Nyakurukwa et al.

Journal of Applied Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650891article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study employs Latent Class Growth Modelling (LCGM) and quantile regression to analyse the trajectories and heterogeneous determinants of digital payment usage intensity (DPU) using data from the Netherlands (2019–2023). LCGM identifies distinct usage trajectories, guiding the quantile regression analysis by determining the number of quantiles to examine. The findings reveal that the baseline DPU declines across quantiles, indicating reduced unexplained variation among high-intensity users. Gender effects show minimal differences at lower quantiles but become significantly positive for females at higher quantiles. Tertiary education and financial knowledge play essential roles at lower quantiles, emphasising their importance in supporting low-intensity users, but their influence diminishes as usage intensity increases. These results imply that targeted interventions for low-intensity users should focus on financial literacy and education, while efforts for high-intensity users may benefit from enhancing usability and engagement with digital payment systems.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650891

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kingstone2026,
  title        = {{Heterogeneous trajectories in digital financial usage intensity: evidence from the Netherlands}},
  author       = {Kingstone Nyakurukwa et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Applied Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650891},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Heterogeneous trajectories in digital financial usage intensity: evidence from the Netherlands

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.