Pathways to global worker representation: Three case studies in the metalworking sector

Anastasia S. Alexeeva et al.

Economic and Industrial Democracy: an international journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251412562article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Forms of labour representation have emerged over recent years that help constrain the global mobility of capital and the strategies of multinational companies (MNCs). This article focuses on one set of developments at company level: forms of voluntary regulation which we refer to as global worker bodies . It analyses the steps taken within three MNCs to establish their global worker bodies: a World Union Council, a Global Union Network and a World Works Council. We apply a regulatory space framework to explore how each MNC set up its global body and followed a distinct pathway that was determined by a unique configuration of factors at different levels. These involved the role of legislation, mandated negotiation, voluntarist negotiation and voluntarism in ‘domains’ at each level. Our research contributes to the literature on global regulatory space by providing a more nuanced understanding of the role of global worker bodies in this context.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251412562

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anastasia2026,
  title        = {{Pathways to global worker representation: Three case studies in the metalworking sector}},
  author       = {Anastasia S. Alexeeva et al.},
  journal      = {Economic and Industrial Democracy: an international journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251412562},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pathways to global worker representation: Three case studies in the metalworking sector

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.