The impact of retouched travel photos on social media audiences’ perceptions of authenticity, perceived aesthetics and impulse travel intention

Shasha Liu et al.

Journal of Vacation Marketing2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667261423650article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

While retouched photos on social media have been argued to be at best inauthentic and at worst fake, this study employs a negotiated authenticity lens in combination with aesthetics theory to investigate how social media audiences perceive the authenticity, including antecedents and consequences, of retouched travel photos, using an online survey. Findings show that in the context of retouched travel photos, perceived constructive authenticity, perceived existential authenticity ascribed by social media audiences, and perceived creative authenticity derived from tourists’ rationale for posting are significantly associated with social media audiences’ perceptions of the authenticity of these photos. This positively associates with perceived aesthetics and in turn, predicts impulse travel intention. Notably, this study demonstrates that social media audiences actively and critically engage in the attribution of authenticity. These findings offer valuable theoretical contributions and provide useful practical implications for tourism providers to plan and design tourism products and marketing collateral.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667261423650

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shasha2026,
  title        = {{The impact of retouched travel photos on social media audiences’ perceptions of authenticity, perceived aesthetics and impulse travel intention}},
  author       = {Shasha Liu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Vacation Marketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667261423650},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The impact of retouched travel photos on social media audiences’ perceptions of authenticity, perceived aesthetics and impulse travel intention

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.