arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation

John M. Halstead et al.

Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1992https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002683article
ABDC C
Weight
0.66

What the paper says

Protest bids are often excluded during analysis of contingent valuation method data. It is suggested that this procedure might introduce significant bias. Protest bids are often registered by respondents who may actually place a higher- or lower -than-average value on the commodity in question but refuse to pay on the basis of ethical or other reasons. Exclusion of protest bids may therefore bias willingness to pay (WTP) results, but the direction of bias is indeterminate a priori.

215 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002683

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{john1992,
  title        = {{Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation}},
  author       = {John M. Halstead et al.},
  journal      = {Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
  year         = {1992},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002683},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.66

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.86 × 0.4 = 0.34
M · momentum0.61 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.