Quality of government cohesion across EU regions: success or failure?

Burhan Can Karahasan

Spatial Economic Analysis2026https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2025.2605132article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Regional differences in institutions is a threat for political and economic integration. In this paper, we analyse the institutional convergence across regions of the European Union (EU). Preliminary results show that there is continuous improvement fostering institutional convergence. However, heterogeneity analyses point-out that the speed of institutional development is influenced by the enlargement phases of the union. Additional results indicate that the regions of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries and the southern regions belonging to Greece and Spain experience faster institutional convergence. Accordingly, the enlargement process, fostering further heterogeneity, is an important element to improve the institutional quality of the new EU members. However, temporal convergence trends show that the dynamics of institutional convergence shift over time, reflecting the non-stationary evolution of success-failure cases.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2025.2605132

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{burhan2026,
  title        = {{Quality of government cohesion across EU regions: success or failure?}},
  author       = {Burhan Can Karahasan},
  journal      = {Spatial Economic Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2025.2605132},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Quality of government cohesion across EU regions: success or failure?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.