Communicating Norms of Conduct: The Semantics of Professionalism

Minqi Liu et al.

Accounting and the Public Interest2025https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2024-017article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper explores how two public accounting associations, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), conveyed norms of conduct to members and students through editorials published in the Journal of Accountancy and CA Magazine from 1916 to 1973, with a focus on the use of profession-related terms. Drawing on Bakhtin’s concept of stylistic aura and employing advanced textual analysis techniques, the study reveals that profession stem words played a key role in communicating these norms by synthesizing varied normative concerns into a cohesive professional discourse applicable across settings. The semantic meanings of these sentences shifted over time and between journals. Additionally, the study finds that utterances with profession stem words were more pervasive and better at highlighting competing concerns than ethics stem words. This study contributes to our understanding of accounting association communication processes, specifically communication via professional narratives.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2024-017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{minqi2025,
  title        = {{Communicating Norms of Conduct: The Semantics of Professionalism}},
  author       = {Minqi Liu et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting and the Public Interest},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2024-017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Communicating Norms of Conduct: The Semantics of Professionalism

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.