arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Applying Internal Labor Market Theories to Firms With Multiple Branch Offices

Joon W. Sohn et al.

Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027004book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

This study investigates the effects of organizational factors on firms' adoption and use of internal staffing strategies. In particular, we examine the different effects of firm- and branch-level factors on the adoption of internal development programs and the selection of entry-level employees. We find that firm-level factors, such as firm size and organizational prestige, are positively associated with the adoption of development programs. Branch-level factors, such as branch size and leverage ratio, are positively associated with entry-level hiring. This study offers new insight into the dynamics between different levels of organizational factors and their relationship with human resource management practices.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joon2023,
  title        = {{Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Applying Internal Labor Market Theories to Firms With Multiple Branch Offices}},
  author       = {Joon W. Sohn et al.},
  journal      = {Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-618620230000027004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Applying Internal Labor Market Theories to Firms With Multiple Branch Offices

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.