A distributionally robust optimization framework for attribute-independent preference estimation

Lingyun Ji & Dali Zhang

Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization2026https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2026051article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this paper, we introduced a framework that requires only choice data to learn a decision-maker's utility, unlike the classic random utility framework which needs historical choices and multiple attributes. We proposed a two-stage optimization model for the single decision-maker's discrete choice processes with sequential uncertainties. In the first stage, the decision-maker made a strategic choice that stochastically determined the set of future alternatives. In the second stage, after these alternatives were realized, the decision-maker made a final operational choice to maximize utility. The second stage was modeled as a distributionally robust optimization problem with a Kullback–Leibler divergence constraint, enabling worst-case utility evaluation. This model built an ambiguity set from historical choice data to define possible distributions for the decision-maker's preferences. We also analyzed the problem's convexity and used an augmented Lagrangian algorithm to find the optimal solution. Extensive numerical experiments, including case studies and in-depth sensitivity analyses, demonstrated the method's effectiveness.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2026051

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lingyun2026,
  title        = {{A distributionally robust optimization framework for attribute-independent preference estimation}},
  author       = {Lingyun Ji & Dali Zhang},
  journal      = {Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2026051},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A distributionally robust optimization framework for attribute-independent preference estimation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.