arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Natural disaster risk salience and the strategic appointment of directors with sustainability expertise

Bo Wang

Journal of Financial Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70045article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article examines how salient sustainability risks from near‐miss natural disasters influence board composition. Using a difference‐in‐differences design, I find that firms located in counties neighboring disaster‐affected areas significantly increase the presence of directors with sustainability expertise following the disaster. The effect is stronger for firms with greater institutional ownership and responsible investor ownership, suggesting that these governance changes are driven by investor expectations and preferences. Further analysis shows that these board changes are not short‐lived, do not crowd out directors with other qualifications, and contribute to improvements in sustainability performance and firm value. Collectively, these findings highlight risk salience as a catalyst for strategic board restructuring.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70045

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bo2026,
  title        = {{Natural disaster risk salience and the strategic appointment of directors with sustainability expertise}},
  author       = {Bo Wang},
  journal      = {Journal of Financial Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70045},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Natural disaster risk salience and the strategic appointment of directors with sustainability expertise

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.