Leisure provision and refugee settlement: A scoping review with stakeholder engagement to inform policy and practice

Najmeh Hassanli et al.

Journal of Leisure Research2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2025.2601997article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This scoping review explores what is known about the role of leisure provision by not-for-profit (NFP) organizations in supporting refugee settlement, with a focus on the Australian context. As the global refugee population grows, individuals face complex settlement challenges, including social isolation. While government programs deliver structured support, the integration of leisure into settlement services remains underexplored. Guided by the Co-Creation Scoping Review Framework, we synthesized academic and nonacademic literature, finding that leisure can enhance refugees’ wellbeing, social capital, and community cohesion, but participant-related and organizational barriers often limit its impact. Building on these insights, interviews with Australian NFP service providers and a multi-stakeholder roundtable identified key knowledge–practice gaps and co-developed practical strategies for leisure program design, evaluation, and sustainability. Implementing these strategies could strengthen leisure provision and better support refugee settlement outcomes.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2025.2601997

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{najmeh2026,
  title        = {{Leisure provision and refugee settlement: A scoping review with stakeholder engagement to inform policy and practice}},
  author       = {Najmeh Hassanli et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Leisure Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2025.2601997},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Leisure provision and refugee settlement: A scoping review with stakeholder engagement to inform policy and practice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.