arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Real-world data and evidence in the development of cell and gene therapies

Yeonhee Kim et al.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2026.2648311article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Cell and gene therapies (CGTs) are rapidly growing fields in regenerative medicine with the potential to tackle the most difficult-to-treat diseases. Despite their transformative potential, the development of CGTs is inherently complex, resource-intensive, and associated with high costs, posing substantial barriers in development and commercialization. As a feasible approach to address these challenges, real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) are gaining increasing recognition as powerful tools to potentially support and accelerate CGT development. This manuscript aims to identify the potential role of RWE and RWD in CGT development, with a focus on its application in regulatory licensure to date. Furthermore, we discuss current challenges, limitations, and evolving regulatory landscape pertaining to the use of RWE in regulatory decision-making.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2026.2648311

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yeonhee2026,
  title        = {{Real-world data and evidence in the development of cell and gene therapies}},
  author       = {Yeonhee Kim et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2026.2648311},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Real-world data and evidence in the development of cell and gene therapies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.