Agentic Information Architectures for Global Climate Governance

Yuan Wang et al.

Journal of Global Information Management2026https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.403439article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Global climate governance depends on information systems that turn fragmented national policies into interoperable knowledge. Existing repositories are largely static and descriptive, which limits evidence-based learning across jurisdictions. The authors present CAPAS, a Cross National Agent Based Policy Analysis System, that integrates large language models, a policy ontology, and multi agent orchestration for automated extraction and recommendation. CAPAS structures 70,000 mitigation policies into seven dimensions covering instruments, actors, sectors, targets, timelines, and implementation mechanisms, enabling fine grained comparison and semantic alignment. A LangGraph-based workflow classifies, extracts, and recommends analogous policies with transparent reasoning. Experiments show improvements in interpretability and transferability. From an information governance view, the study shows how agentic architectures operationalize the information lifecycle across jurisdictions and extends decision support system theory to global policy analysis.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.403439

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuan2026,
  title        = {{Agentic Information Architectures for Global Climate Governance}},
  author       = {Yuan Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Global Information Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.403439},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Agentic Information Architectures for Global Climate Governance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.