Navigating Inter‐Municipal Collaboration Challenges: 'In‐Tensions' in Shared Service Center and Joint Venture Arrangements

Isabell Meltzer & Gustaf Kastberg

Financial Accountability and Management2026https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70029article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Municipal collaborations such as shared service centers and joint ventures are widely promoted as ways to strengthen local service capacity. Yet they often develop in uneven and sometimes unstable ways. This paper examines why arrangements built on similar institutional promises take such different trajectories in practice. Drawing on a qualitative study of five inter‐municipal collaborations, we analyze how tensions emerge and persist through processes of framing, entanglement, disentanglement, and overflow. We identify three recurrent in‐tensions—strategic, governance, and service—that illustrate how collaborative work is continually pulled between competing concerns and expectations. Rather than viewing difficulties as implementation failures, we show that instability is an inherent feature of collaborative organizing, arising from the ongoing effort to balance autonomy with interdependence across multiple principals, operative units, and service users. The paper contributes a practice‐oriented explanation of why inter‐municipal collaboration often remains fragile and highlights how persistent tensions shape the possibilities for sustaining joint arrangements over time.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70029

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{isabell2026,
  title        = {{Navigating Inter‐Municipal Collaboration Challenges: 'In‐Tensions' in Shared Service Center and Joint Venture Arrangements}},
  author       = {Isabell Meltzer & Gustaf Kastberg},
  journal      = {Financial Accountability and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70029},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating Inter‐Municipal Collaboration Challenges: 'In‐Tensions' in Shared Service Center and Joint Venture Arrangements

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.