arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Partisanship, Trump Favorability, and Americans’ Evaluations of the FBI

Carly Watts & James C. Garand

Social Science Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70131article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Background While Republicans have traditionally been seen as supportive of US law enforcement, after 2016, many Republicans came to view the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as politically biased due to its investigation of possible collusion with the Russian government by the Trump campaign. Aims We explore how partisanship and evaluations of Donald Trump affect evaluations of the FBI. We hypothesize that the relationship between partisanship and FBI evaluations is conditioned on individuals’ support for Donald Trump. Materials and Methods We use data from the 2020 and 2016 American National Election Survey (ANES) to analyze evaluations of the FBI. For the sake of comparison, we analyze evaluations of the police as a placebo case. Results We find: (1) there is a direct negative effect of Trump support on FBI evaluations, and (2) as support for Trump increases, the relationship between Republican partisanship and FBI evaluations is significantly diminished. We contrast FBI evaluations in 2020 to evaluations of the police in 2016 and 2020, finding that both Trump support and Republican partisan identification have direct positive effects on Americans’ support for the police.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70131

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carly2026,
  title        = {{Partisanship, Trump Favorability, and Americans’ Evaluations of the FBI}},
  author       = {Carly Watts & James C. Garand},
  journal      = {Social Science Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70131},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Partisanship, Trump Favorability, and Americans’ Evaluations of the FBI

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.