A novel hybrid decision support methodology for data-driven comparative analysis of EU macroeconomic performance

Gökhan Çobanoğulları & Dragan Pamucar

Journal of Applied Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650888article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the macroeconomic performance of 24 European Union (EU) member countries for the period 2014–2023 using the data-driven Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach. In this context, an integrated weighting methodology combining Entropy and CRITIC techniques is applied together with Adaptive Standardized Intervals Based Alternative Ranking Technique (ARTASI) to ensure objectivity, stability and sensitivity in the analysis. In addition, in order to provide a comparative assessment of subjective and objective weightings in the study, opinions received from eight academicians who are experts in their fields are carried out with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. Evaluating countries across eight key indicators, the results demonstrate that integrating both weighting methods enhances the robustness of the rankings Malta, the Netherlands, Denmark, the Czech Republic and Ireland generally show strong economic stability over the period considered, while Greece, Italy, Spain, France and Romania show the weakest weak performances.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650888

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gökhan2026,
  title        = {{A novel hybrid decision support methodology for data-driven comparative analysis of EU macroeconomic performance}},
  author       = {Gökhan Çobanoğulları & Dragan Pamucar},
  journal      = {Journal of Applied Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2026.2650888},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A novel hybrid decision support methodology for data-driven comparative analysis of EU macroeconomic performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.