Review and Comparison of Content Growth in Word Definition of Persian Speaking Children of 7-12 Years of Age

Shima Matloubi et al.

Journal of Rehabilitation2018https://doi.org/10.21859/jrehab.19.1.4article
AJG 1
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

Objective Language has three components: content, form and pragmatic. The content includes the semantic components. Semantic knowledge of word relationships requires awareness of the relationships between different words in the same field and other fields. One of the main components of the semantic is the mental lexicon that many of the semantic communications, including the organization and semantic representations of words, take shape in this network. The important issue is how to organize words in mind, linking the words together and their position in the semantic network. One task that helps to organize the meanings of the words in the mental lexicon is the word definition task. The ability to define words is reliant o several aspects of linguistic and metalinguistic development, literacy, and academic achievement. The aim of this investigation was to study the definitional style of nouns in typically developing school-aged children.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21859/jrehab.19.1.4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shima2018,
  title        = {{Review and Comparison of Content Growth in Word Definition of Persian Speaking Children of 7-12 Years of Age}},
  author       = {Shima Matloubi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Rehabilitation},
  year         = {2018},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21859/jrehab.19.1.4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Review and Comparison of Content Growth in Word Definition of Persian Speaking Children of 7-12 Years of Age

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.12 × 0.4 = 0.05
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.