Utopian dreaming? Assessing Taylor’s scientific management through claims of its utopianism

Kathleen Hughes

Journal of Management History2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-09-2025-0155article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine descriptions of Taylor or scientific management as utopian, including the context, intent and contradictions in the claims made. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a review of texts describing Taylor or his work and influence as “utopian,” alongside wider contextual analysis using Taylor’s writing, relevant contemporary material and other commentary within the academic business and management community. Findings A search produced 21 texts within relevant academic disciplines which describe Taylor, scientific management, or its application as “utopian.” They can be categorized into four broad themes: “Taylor’s utopian cultural influence(s),” “Taylor’s idealism,” “Rhetoric and myth” and “Social applications and social reform.” The thematic analysis of these texts creates a deeper understanding of how the term “utopia” is used in relation to scientific management, including flaws and contradictions in the usage of the term, as well as groundwork for further analysis. Originality/value This paper creates new knowledge with regard to scientific management through its focus on descriptions of its utopianism, assessing claims alongside contemporary material and contexts, including Taylor’s writings.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-09-2025-0155

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kathleen2026,
  title        = {{Utopian dreaming? Assessing Taylor’s scientific management through claims of its utopianism}},
  author       = {Kathleen Hughes},
  journal      = {Journal of Management History},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-09-2025-0155},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Utopian dreaming? Assessing Taylor’s scientific management through claims of its utopianism

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.