← Back to results Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions Shiri Alon & Ehud Lehrer
Abstract We provide axioms that relate the preferences of each group in a society to the preferences of the subgroups contained in them. These axioms yield cardinal utility indices for each individual and a representation of group preferences as the group-dependent weighted sum of the utility indices of the members of that group. We show that these weights are group independent whenever one additional axiom and a mild linear independence assumption are satisfied. (JEL D11, D71, D81, D83)
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240068 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{shiri2026,
title = {{Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions}},
author = {Shiri Alon & Ehud Lehrer},
journal = {American Economic Journal: Microeconomics},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240068},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions
AU - Alon, Shiri
AU - Lehrer, Ehud
JO - American Economic Journal: Microeconomics
PY - 2026
ER - Shiri Alon & Ehud Lehrer (2026). Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions. *American Economic Journal: Microeconomics*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240068 Shiri Alon & Ehud Lehrer. "Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions." *American Economic Journal: Microeconomics* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240068. Cardinality and Utilitarianism through Social Interactions
Shiri Alon & Ehud Lehrer · American Economic Journal: Microeconomics · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20240068 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.