Political thinking: How social and cognitive factors shape stances across the life course.

Bolivar Reyes-Jaquez & Tamar Kushnir

Journal of Experimental Psychology: general2026https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001874article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Work on issues such as when political stances emerge, and the social and cognitive factors that influence their development or entrenchment with age, is ongoing across different disciplines. However, there is a need for integration and synthesis of these ideas to better understand the formation of political reasoning. The goal of this issue was to highlight the emerging work that addressed developmental origins and age-related changes in political thought. Answering these questions required psychological scientists to reach across disciplines-thus, each of these articles draws on ideas from fields such as political science, sociology, and education. Together, the set of articles featured in this December 2025 issue cover cognitions related to political thought and behavior, including fairness, leadership, activism, partisanship, voting, misinformation, conspiratorial, and social dominance orientations-from early childhood to late adulthood. We also discuss areas of research not reflected in the submissions we received and motivate our readership of experimental scholars to address those gaps in future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001874

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bolivar2026,
  title        = {{Political thinking: How social and cognitive factors shape stances across the life course.}},
  author       = {Bolivar Reyes-Jaquez & Tamar Kushnir},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: general},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001874},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Political thinking: How social and cognitive factors shape stances across the life course.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.