arbiter
JournalsAccount

Conceptualising professional services researchers as a sustainable career development route in higher education

Charlotte Verney & Helen Curtis

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management2026https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2025.2607810article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This paper considers whether engaging in research offers opportunities for professional services staff to develop a sustainable career. It draws on data generated through reflective accounts of the two authors, and supplements this with questionnaire data, and video accounts published on an external website. We found that the career experiences of professional services researchers are deeply shaped by working in the higher education sector, that interest and engagement in research evolves over time, and is shaped by the expectations of the specific profession. Those involved in research saw it as an important part of their professional development, and the combination of research and practice allowed them to find more meaningful work and a firm foundation for future careers in the sector. We suggest that the global higher education sector could benefit from recognising and enabling research as a development activity for professional services and make recommendations for practice.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2025.2607810

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charlotte2026,
  title        = {{Conceptualising professional services researchers as a sustainable career development route in higher education}},
  author       = {Charlotte Verney & Helen Curtis},
  journal      = {Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2025.2607810},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Conceptualising professional services researchers as a sustainable career development route in higher education

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.