arbiter
JournalsAccount

Say on pay votes and the use of relative performance evaluation in executive compensation

Fangjun Sang & Indrarini Laksmana

Eurasian Business Review2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-025-00325-7article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Relative performance evaluation (RPE) is viewed as an efficient way to assess agents’ actions since it uses peer performance to insulate agents’ common risk (Holmstrom, 1982). This study examines whether the implementation of the Say on Pay vote (hereafter the SOP vote) enhances the use of RPE in executive compensation. The presence of RPE is jointly determined by a significantly positive coefficient on the firm’s unsystematic performance component and an insignificant or significantly negative coefficient on the firm’s systematic performance component. Using a U.S.-based sample from 2006 to 2023, we predict and find strong evidence for the increased use of RPE in executive compensation after the implementation of the SOP vote, particularly for firms with excess compensation. We also find that the increased use of RPE in the post-SOP-vote period exists in firms with non-price competition but not in firms with price competition. Overall, our study documents a positive regulatory effect on efficient contracting in executive compensation practice.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-025-00325-7

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fangjun2026,
  title        = {{Say on pay votes and the use of relative performance evaluation in executive compensation}},
  author       = {Fangjun Sang & Indrarini Laksmana},
  journal      = {Eurasian Business Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-025-00325-7},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Say on pay votes and the use of relative performance evaluation in executive compensation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.