Screening Investments, Pure Protectionism, or Cultural Securitisation?

Floriane Chang

Journal of World Investment and Trade2026https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340390article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The article conducts a comprehensive examination of Canada’s Foreign Direct Investment screening mechanisms, with a specific focus on the cultural sector as outlined in the Investment Canada Act. Through a detailed analysis, this study reveals Canada’s distinctive stance on integrating cultural considerations into its FDI policies, setting it apart from other major economies like the United States or China, which lack similar measures. Utilising a mixed-methods approach that combines doctrinal analysis with case studies, this article unpacks the rationale behind Canada’s protective stance towards its cultural industries. It argues that Canada’s approach is not merely a manifestation of economic protectionism but a strategic effort to safeguard cultural sovereignty and national identity amid globalisation pressures. The findings suggest that Canada’s policy could serve as a precedent for other nations seeking to balance cultural sovereignty and economic openness. Moreover, the article raises critical questions about the potential implications of linking cultural protection with national security concerns for Interactive Digital Media, highlighting a nuanced debate on the intersection of cultural policy and sovereignty in the age of digital globalisation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340390

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{floriane2026,
  title        = {{Screening Investments, Pure Protectionism, or Cultural Securitisation?}},
  author       = {Floriane Chang},
  journal      = {Journal of World Investment and Trade},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340390},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Screening Investments, Pure Protectionism, or Cultural Securitisation?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.