Impact of Workplace Bullying on Psychological Distress: Role of Perceived Organisational Support and Religious Coping

Mei Teh Goi et al.

Asian Academy of Management Journal2024https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2024.29.2.9article
ABDC C
Weight
0.45

What the paper says

Despite the fact that perceived organisational support (POS) and religious coping have been advocated as a crucial component of the stress model, the roles remain unclear among academics that often associate with heavy workloads. Therefore, this study aims to examine the moderating role of POS, and the mediating role of religious coping between the relationship of workplace bullying and psychological distress among academics in higher educational institutions (HEIs). Data were collected from academic staff from private and public universities in Malaysia, and a total of 219 data were used. The results revealed that workplace bullying has a positive impact on academics’ psychological distress, and the POS significantly moderated the relationship between workplace bullying and psychological distress. However, this study failed to support the mediating role of religious coping. This study adds to our knowledge of the stress model, by focusing more on perceived organisational support in minimising psychological distress and less on personal resources (religious coping).

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2024.29.2.9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mei2024,
  title        = {{Impact of Workplace Bullying on Psychological Distress: Role of Perceived Organisational Support and Religious Coping}},
  author       = {Mei Teh Goi et al.},
  journal      = {Asian Academy of Management Journal},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2024.29.2.9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Impact of Workplace Bullying on Psychological Distress: Role of Perceived Organisational Support and Religious Coping

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.45

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.35 × 0.4 = 0.14
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.