Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership

Grace Qing Hao & Keming Li

Managerial Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2025-0314article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose We examine whether industry peers influence a firm’s innovation output and whether institutional cross-ownership is an important mechanism behind the peer effect. Design/methodology/approach We address endogeneity using two complementary identification strategies: (1) peer firms’ lagged idiosyncratic equity returns as an instrument for peer innovation and (2) staggered changes in state-level corporate income tax rates as a quasi-natural experiment. Innovation output is measured using patent counts. We estimate negative binomial models and implement a two-step control function approach. Heterogeneity analyses examine the moderating roles of institutional cross-ownership, information uncertainty and industry competition. Findings We find evidence of positive peer effects on innovation output. Effects are stronger when peers share institutional blockholders, when uncertainty is higher and in more competitive industries. Patent citation flows indicate greater knowledge transfer among cross-owned peers. Originality/value We are the first to show that institutional cross-ownership strengthens industry peer effects on innovation output by facilitating information spillovers, offering new evidence on how common owners shape real corporate outcomes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2025-0314

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{grace2026,
  title        = {{Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership}},
  author       = {Grace Qing Hao & Keming Li},
  journal      = {Managerial Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2025-0314},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Innovation peer effects and institutional cross-ownership

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.