arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

No oral modification clauses: An Australian response to MWB business exchange centres v rock advertising [2018] 2 WLR 1603

George Pasas

University of Western Australia Law Review2019article
ABDC B
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

The strict enforcement of No Oral Modification clauses offers considerable commercial benefit. It also simultaneously conflicts with the fundamental common law principle of party autonomy. In 2018,...

Cite this paper

@article{george2019,
  title        = {{No oral modification clauses: An Australian response to MWB business exchange centres v rock advertising [2018] 2 WLR 1603}},
  author       = {George Pasas},
  journal      = {University of Western Australia Law Review},
  year         = {2019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

No oral modification clauses: An Australian response to MWB business exchange centres v rock advertising [2018] 2 WLR 1603

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.