Two Sides of the Same Coin: Fraud Prevention and Accountability in Retail Payments

Judith Arnal

Journal of Financial Regulation2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaf007article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Retail payment fraud has become a structural challenge that no longer falls solely within the remit of payment service providers. As transactions flow through increasingly fragmented digital ecosystems, the mismatch between where fraud occurs and where liability resides is becoming unsustainable. This article examines how modern fraud exploits institutional asymmetries and identifies the need for a realignment of preventive duties and financial responsibility. Drawing on international experiences—from Singapore’s cascading liability model to the UK’s reimbursement regime—it argues that effective fraud prevention requires proportional accountability across the full value chain. The analysis then turns to the evolving European regulatory framework, highlighting its ambition but also its structural and legal constraints. The article concludes with policy recommendations aimed at fostering meaningful cross-sectoral cooperation, clarifying data-sharing rules, and institutionalizing shared accountability mechanisms. In doing so, it contends that fraud prevention and accountability are not separate goals, but rather two sides of the same coin.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaf007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{judith2025,
  title        = {{Two Sides of the Same Coin: Fraud Prevention and Accountability in Retail Payments}},
  author       = {Judith Arnal},
  journal      = {Journal of Financial Regulation},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaf007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Fraud Prevention and Accountability in Retail Payments

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.