Double-edged sword The influence of digital technology adoption diversity on knowledge sharing

Pinglu Zhou et al.

International Journal of Technology Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.143584article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Digital transformation is crucial for firms to gain competitive advantages. While many studies focus on digital technologies, they take all digital technologies as the same and fail to explore the heterogeneity of digital technology. Motivated by this gap, this study explores the relationship between digital technology adoption diversity and knowledge sharing. Empirical findings from survey data of 123 large companies indicated that the association between digital technology adoption diversity and external knowledge sharing is inverted-U shaped; the association between digital technology adoption diversity and internal knowledge sharing is linear and positive. Moreover, environmental turbulence, including technological and policy turbulence, plays a moderating role on this relationship. This study expands the knowledge on digital transformation and knowledge management.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.143584

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{pinglu2025,
  title        = {{Double-edged sword The influence of digital technology adoption diversity on knowledge sharing}},
  author       = {Pinglu Zhou et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Technology Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2025.143584},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Double-edged sword The influence of digital technology adoption diversity on knowledge sharing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.