Scheduling cool jobs when processing heats them

Roel Lambers et al.

Journal of Scheduling2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-025-00870-zarticle
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract We consider a one-machine scheduling problem where the temperature of a job rises during processing and cools down when not being processed according to given linear heating and cooling rates. No job’s temperature is allowed to rise above a given threshold, and no job’s temperature can cool below 0. Another crucial property of our problem is that jobs can be preempted an arbitrary number of times, and even more, we allow that a job is processed for an infinitely small amount of time. We consider two objectives: minimize the makespan and minimize the sum of completion times. Our results are as follows. We show how to compactly represent a solution. Further, we prove that the problem of minimizing the sum of completion times can be solved in polynomial time by formulating it as a linear program and deriving a structural property. This result can be extended to hold for any number of machines. Further, we show that a minimum makespan can be found in O ( n ) time, even when heating and cooling rates are job-dependent.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-025-00870-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{roel2026,
  title        = {{Scheduling cool jobs when processing heats them}},
  author       = {Roel Lambers et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Scheduling},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-025-00870-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Scheduling cool jobs when processing heats them

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.