arbiter
JournalsAccount

Impartial observer theorem with ambiguity

Raphael Gomes de Oliveira

Journal of Mathematical Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103237article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper revisits the debate between Harsanyi and Rawls on collective decision-making with impartiality (Veil of Ignorance), focusing on how different levels of uncertainty influence the resulting social welfare functions. By incorporating ambiguity into the Impartial Observer framework, the paper constructs a continuum of compromise positions between Harsanyi’s utilitarian approach and Rawls’s maximin rule. In the proposed model, the independence between the uncertainty faced by the Impartial Observer over the distributions of identities and the uncertainty faced by each individual over the distributions of outcomes allows us to introduce ambiguity on both identity acts and/or outcome acts to explore various configurations where the Impartial Observer’s preference representation changes based on the type and level of uncertainty considered. The results offer a more nuanced understanding of impartiality in social choice contexts and help clarify the philosophical foundations of the Harsanyi–Rawls debate.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103237

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{raphael2026,
  title        = {{Impartial observer theorem with ambiguity}},
  author       = {Raphael Gomes de Oliveira},
  journal      = {Journal of Mathematical Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103237},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Impartial observer theorem with ambiguity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.