Between consensus and contention. Economic defence, industry interests, and the funding of metal stockpiling in Sweden, 1973–1987

Olle Jansson et al.

Scandinavian Economic History Review2025https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2025.2492565article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The turmoil of conflict and international crisis affects government as well as business interests. This article investigates how government–business relationships developed to tackle the potential problems of so-called peacetime crises that could adversely affect the country's steel and metal industries if the imports of alloy metals were disrupted in Sweden during the 1970s and 1980s. Based on extensive archival material and using an Advocacy Coalition Framework, we examine how this problem was negotiated between key stakeholders in Sweden during the period 1973–1987. We conclude that while the corporatist arrangements for negotiation were designed to build consensus, the state and business interests ultimately came into disagreement with each other. These results reflect recent research which emphasise that the relations between the state defence actors and business interests have been characterised by antagonism and contentions to a much larger degree than has been assumed in previous research.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2025.2492565

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{olle2025,
  title        = {{Between consensus and contention. Economic defence, industry interests, and the funding of metal stockpiling in Sweden, 1973–1987}},
  author       = {Olle Jansson et al.},
  journal      = {Scandinavian Economic History Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2025.2492565},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Between consensus and contention. Economic defence, industry interests, and the funding of metal stockpiling in Sweden, 1973–1987

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.