arbiter
JournalsAccount

Countering Illiberalism in Liberal Democracies: Information, Legacies, Temporalities

Giovanni Capoccia

Comparative Political Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418663article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The article lays the foundations of a research agenda on the conditions favoring short-term success against emerging illiberal challenges—necessary for democrats to rebuild support and strengthen democratic resilience. When confronting an illiberal executive (resistance scenario) or a rising illiberal opposition (prevention scenario), democrats face a temporal paradox: early in the confrontation, illiberals are easier to defeat, but uncertainty about the regime threat hampers coordination and mobilization. As illiberals gain influence, the threat becomes clearer, improving the chances of effective coordination, yet the range of viable countermeasures shrinks, reducing the likelihood of success. Exogenous information and favorable institutional legacies enhance democrats’ ability to navigate this paradox successfully. When an illiberal opposition is on the brink of power, democrats enter trench warfare (containment scenario), best seen as part of a longer-run sequence. The article identifies key research challenges and summarizes how the contributions to this special issue address some of them.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418663

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giovanni2026,
  title        = {{Countering Illiberalism in Liberal Democracies: Information, Legacies, Temporalities}},
  author       = {Giovanni Capoccia},
  journal      = {Comparative Political Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261418663},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Countering Illiberalism in Liberal Democracies: Information, Legacies, Temporalities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.