arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND PROXY VOTING IN KOREA

Sang-Lae Lee

Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics2015https://doi.org/10.15057/27195article
ABDC B
Weight
0.43

What the paper says

This paper investigates the role of institutional investors as corporate monitors by analyzing the relationship between proxy voting decisions and firm performance in Korea. We find that institutional investors support more proposals when firm performance is strong. They are more likely to support the proposals when ownership of the blockholder and foreign investors are high. It suggests that institutional investors monitor firms through active voting on the proposals relating to performance. On the contrary, National Pension Service ʼ affirmative voting decisions is negatively related to firm performance. Furthermore, we also find that institutional investors ʼ voting is significantly related to the long-term performance and impact the pass of proposal and they more carefully monitor financially distressed firm.

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/27195

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sang-lae2015,
  title        = {{CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND PROXY VOTING IN KOREA}},
  author       = {Sang-Lae Lee},
  journal      = {Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2015},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/27195},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND PROXY VOTING IN KOREA

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.43

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.28 × 0.4 = 0.11
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.