← Back to results The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice Patricia Jackson Farrell et al.
Abstract SUMMARY To gain insights into external factors that impact auditors’ ability to meet regulatory requirements and thus audit quality, we review the existing audit literature on individual auditor mindset through three well-accepted mindset theories (Nolder and Kadous 2018; Gollwitzer 1990, 2012; Dweck 2006). Our paper reveals that the mindset of the individual auditor is a potential factor impacting their ability to meet regulatory requirements that are intended to promote audit quality. Implications of these findings for practitioners are discussed.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2024-051 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{patricia2025,
title = {{The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice}},
author = {Patricia Jackson Farrell et al.},
journal = {Current Issues in Auditing},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2024-051},
} TY - JOUR
TI - The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice
AU - al., Patricia Jackson Farrell et
JO - Current Issues in Auditing
PY - 2025
ER - Patricia Jackson Farrell et al. (2025). The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice. *Current Issues in Auditing*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2024-051 Patricia Jackson Farrell et al.. "The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice." *Current Issues in Auditing* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2024-051. The State of the Literature on the Effect of Auditors’ Mindset on Audit Quality: Implications for Practice
Patricia Jackson Farrell et al. · Current Issues in Auditing · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2024-051 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.