Survey to determine design improvements for firefighters’ turnout gear user experience
Myoung-Ok Kim et al.
What the paper says
Purpose This study aimed to assess firefighters’ (FFs) satisfaction levels regarding their current turnout gear, to learn about their evaluation of heat stress-related treatments and to identify important elements and fabric properties of turnout gear to improve future designs and fabrics. Design/methodology/approach The study analyzed 39 FFs’ survey data collected in local fire department in the Midwest in the USA in 2022. Findings The survey results confirmed that FFs evaluated their turnout gear as sufficient for providing adequate thermal protection. FFs were relatively satisfied with the current turnout gear in terms of ease of putting on, accessing equipment, range of motion and gear weight. However, they were somewhat less satisfied with the presence of potentially cancer-causing materials, body cooling and the ability to block electromagnetic radiation, with the latter receiving the lowest satisfaction ratings. The study highlighted the importance of including a heart rate monitoring system, an automated body cooling system and a location monitoring system in the turnout gear. Additionally, the gear should be lightweight and offer protection from burn injuries and cancer-causing materials to improve the current FFs' turnout gear. Research limitations/implications There is a limitation in generalizing the findings to represent the opinions of all FFs in the USA due to the relatively small number of survey participants. Originality/value The study surveyed FFs’ turnout gear usage to assess their needs and identify areas for design improvements. The findings provide valuable information to reflect design enhancements that support optimal work performance by reducing work-related injuries and improving satisfaction levels.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.