arbiter
JournalsAccount

The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation

Jingxian Chen

Journal of International Economic Law2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf017article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The Global Minimum Tax (GMT) has become a focal point in international tax policy, yet China’s response to this development has been notably absent. Despite its political commitment to the GMT, China has yet to take any legislative steps towards its implementation. This article first examines the reasons behind China’s inaction on the GMT legislation from economic, political, and legal perspectives. It finds that the GMT’s limited impact on Chinese tax revenue is the decisive factor. It then explores the strategies that China can adopt in response to the GMT. In the short term, China can continue to adopt a wait-and-see strategy. If it chooses to respond to the GMT, enhancing existing tax laws to mitigate top-up tax revenue loss is a more cost-effective choice than adopting the GMT legislation based on the OECD model. Finally, from a broader perspective, this article reflects on China’s role in global tax governance. As the unilateralism approach of the USA during Donald Trump’s second term poses challenges to the multilateral tax system, China should transform from a silent observer into an active contributor in order to maintain the stability of the multilateral tax system.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jingxian2025,
  title        = {{The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation}},
  author       = {Jingxian Chen},
  journal      = {Journal of International Economic Law},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The silent giant: China’s inaction on global minimum tax legislation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.