Option pricing in a cap-and-trade market: Evidence from New Zealand fisheries

Cameron Birchall et al.

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103326article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We present empirical evidence of option pricing in a created market to address stock externalities in a common-pool resource. Using unique data on New Zealand’s quota fisheries, we show that tradable quota can carry an option premium of over 10 percent (i.e., the quota price is relatively higher at the start of the fishing year). By exploiting differences in species that are exported fresh and frozen, we show that an option premium arises only if a fisher can earn higher profits by aligning harvesting with high market prices. Since quota represents a forward-looking option to produce throughout the year, the quota price accounts for the potential value of using quota later in the year, when it may be more profitable.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103326

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cameron2026,
  title        = {{Option pricing in a cap-and-trade market: Evidence from New Zealand fisheries}},
  author       = {Cameron Birchall et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Environmental Economics and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2026.103326},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Option pricing in a cap-and-trade market: Evidence from New Zealand fisheries

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.