arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Generating Experimental Text Stimuli for Psychological Research Using ChatGPT

Jacqueline Lechuga & Nakul N. Karle

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (AMPPS)2026https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251407631article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The introduction of ChatGPT—an artificial-intelligence (AI) chatbot capable of text recognition and generation—has been transformative for numerous academic research communities, including psychology. We propose using ChatGPT to reduce researchers’ cognitive load and time spent creating text materials for psychological studies (e.g., vignettes). We present examples of ChatGPT-generated text materials for relationship-science ( N = 60) and social-cognition ( N = 67) studies and provide evidence of their effectiveness. Furthermore, we discuss ethical considerations and make recommendations related to using text materials generated by ChatGPT or similar AI tools. We end with a brief discussion of the importance of this work and encourage others to leverage AI in the field of psychology.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251407631

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jacqueline2026,
  title        = {{Generating Experimental Text Stimuli for Psychological Research Using ChatGPT}},
  author       = {Jacqueline Lechuga & Nakul N. Karle},
  journal      = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (AMPPS)},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251407631},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Generating Experimental Text Stimuli for Psychological Research Using ChatGPT

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.