A comparative history of accounting traditions in China and Japan

Eagle Zhang & Masayoshi Noguchi

Accounting History2025https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732241304811article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The political differences between Chinese and Japanese imperial systems offer a foundation for this study of accounting traditions in East Asia. For much of pre-modern history, the Chinese empire had a highly centralised power structure in which accounting gradually became a political institution that supported the emperor's power of governance. In pre-modern Japan, however, political control was largely shared by the shogunate and local clans of feudal lords, diverting power away from a central monarch. In such an environment, Japanese accounting traditions were orientated towards the business interests of major merchants, rather than the political interests of a centralised state. These political variances also underpin the different journeys that both countries have taken in their transition to embrace Western-style accounting practices from the late nineteenth century. This comparative history reinforces that accounting is highly responsive towards broader socio-political structures, adapting to the specific needs of changing circumstances in particular contexts.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732241304811

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eagle2025,
  title        = {{A comparative history of accounting traditions in China and Japan}},
  author       = {Eagle Zhang & Masayoshi Noguchi},
  journal      = {Accounting History},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732241304811},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A comparative history of accounting traditions in China and Japan

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.