Negotiating Permission to Dance: Care-Embedded Serious Leisure in Urban China

Shang Li

Leisure Sciences: an interdisciplinary journal2026https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2026.2614383article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Based on six months of ethnography in a third-tier Chinese city, this article shows how middle-aged and older women pursue square dancing as serious leisure while navigating caregiving and gendered time. Access is negotiated—not freely chosen—through household bargaining, moral justification, and temporal coordination. Framed by an ethic of care, participants legitimized dancing via health, duty, and family well-being and, when risks to dependents arose, sometimes withdrew to preserve future permission. The article theorizes care-embedded serious leisure and specifies three sustaining mechanisms under routine interruption: emotional seriousness (dance’s felt necessity), relational legitimacy work (earning and maintaining permission at home), and the interrupted relational leisure career, marked by readiness and rapid reentry. The study contributes to feminist leisure research and extends serious-leisure theory beyond liberal-individualist assumptions by reconceptualizing perseverance as readiness plus return and by foregrounding household authorization and between-practice work, not only skill or identity.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2026.2614383

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shang2026,
  title        = {{Negotiating Permission to Dance: Care-Embedded Serious Leisure in Urban China}},
  author       = {Shang Li},
  journal      = {Leisure Sciences: an interdisciplinary journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2026.2614383},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Negotiating Permission to Dance: Care-Embedded Serious Leisure in Urban China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.