Engineering of a proactive stakeholder culture

Mohammad A. Ali & Stephen Jones

Journal of Business and Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/jbm.2025.146955article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study builds on previous scholarly works that argue that stakeholder management is a normative process and that organisations should develop a proactive stakeholder orientation to get the optimal benefit of stakeholder management. We add to the extant literature by conducting an exploratory, inductive, qualitative case study to improve our understanding of how proactive stakeholder organisations engineer and maintain a culture that supports a proactive stakeholder orientation. We argue that proactive stakeholder culture must be studied because it represents unique and specific philosophical underpinnings rather than ethical or socially responsible cultures. The study makes several contributions to the scholarly literature on stakeholder culture. First, the study builds theoretical generalisations of the phenomenon under consideration. Second, it provides the best practices and content for developing proactive stakeholder cultures. Third, it defines and discovers a critical moderator, i.e., confining pressure, between well-established stakeholder cultural values and psychological stages of ethical decision-making. Finally, the study has an inferential contribution that a strong proactive culture may help organisational members successfully go through the stages of moral decision-making, as Rest (1986) enumerated.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/jbm.2025.146955

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohammad2025,
  title        = {{Engineering of a proactive stakeholder culture}},
  author       = {Mohammad A. Ali & Stephen Jones},
  journal      = {Journal of Business and Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/jbm.2025.146955},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Engineering of a proactive stakeholder culture

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.