← Back to results Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries Mingyu Qi et al.
Abstract Our findings suggest a substitution between Medicaid HCBS and Medicare CIHHC among dual-eligible older adults at the margin of using Medicaid HCBS, a relationship that should be taken into account when evaluating either program. These findings also align with the hypothesis that Medicare CIHHC is being used as a substitute for LTC, and the availability of home-based LTC may help to alleviate this potentially inefficient use.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70109 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{mingyu2026,
title = {{Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries}},
author = {Mingyu Qi et al.},
journal = {Health Services Research},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70109},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
AU - al., Mingyu Qi et
JO - Health Services Research
PY - 2026
ER - Mingyu Qi et al. (2026). Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries. *Health Services Research*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70109 Mingyu Qi et al.. "Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries." *Health Services Research* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70109. Is Medicare Home Health Care Utilization Substituting for Long‐Term Care? Evidence From Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
Mingyu Qi et al. · Health Services Research · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70109 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.